The Quest for Romance, Riches, and Power in Cinderella Essay Example

The Quest for Romance, Riches, and Power in Cinderella Essay In Marl Attars An Introduction To Fairy Tales, the principle in her essay that I chose to analyze the story through Is Fairy tales are up close and personal, telling us about he quest for romance and riches, for power and privilege, and, most important, for a way out of the woods back to the safety and security of home (Attar 230). Some of the characters in Cinderella wanted romance, power, riches, or maybe even all three. Some were successful in their quests, and some were not. I will analyze Cinderella in terms of how each of the characters go about gaining their own personal desires. First of all. I will start out with the quests the step-sisters went on for romance and riches. One instance of them on a quest for riches was at the end of the story when hey went to Cinderella wedding to get on her good side. The story states that they were there to share her good fortune (Grimm 245). However, because they were there only to become rich and not because they really cared about Cinderella, the pigeons gave them their karma. We will write a custom essay sample on The Quest for Romance, Riches, and Power in Cinderella specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on The Quest for Romance, Riches, and Power in Cinderella specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on The Quest for Romance, Riches, and Power in Cinderella specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer They pecked their eyes out which blinded them, for being deceptive and wicked people. This Is a good example of a quest for riches because this a failed attempt to gain one of their desires. They tried to gain fortune but instead got what they truly deserved which was blindness. In addition to that, the step-sisters also made another quest to gain riches. Because they desperately wanted to be wed to the prince, they cut off parts of their feet to fit In the slipper. I found that this was not only an attempt to gain riches, but also romance. Obviously if you marry a prince you are going to gain fortune. Throughout the story there are multiple times where you can tell that the step-sisters are basically gold- diggers. For example, at the beginning of the story you begin to see that they are very materialistic when they ask their father to bring them pearls, Jewels, and beautiful dresses (241). I think that supports my claim that this Is a quest for riches cause they are described as vile and black of heart (241 If someone Is really of that nature then there is no room for love in their lives. With that being said, I can assume that the step-sisters only wanted to marry him for his fortune. Looking at this in another perspective, it is also a quest for romance. The step- the slipper. It is really astonishing that they literally went to the extent of enduring the pain of cutting off parts of their feet Just to get married. Perhaps they may not have done it for real love, and they may have only wanted to marry him for the wrong reasons UT by giving them the benefit of the doubt this is definitely an example of a quest for romance. Looking at it from a personal view, I would assume that if you go as far as chopping off body parts to marry someone, you must truly love and want to be with that person. In addition, the step-sisters cutting off parts of their feet in order to fit the slipper can also be seen as a quest for power. However, instead of it being the step-sisters quest, it is actually the stepmothers. I mentioned earlier that obviously when you marry a prince, you are going to gain fortune, well that statement also applies to rower. In addition to gaining fortune when you marry into royalty, you also get power. In the story the stepmother is very power-hungry and controlling. In fact, she was even the one that had convinced the step-sisters to cut off parts of their feet in the first place. The stepmother handed one of them a knife and said Cut the toe off; when thou art Queen thou wilt have no more need to go on foot (244). You see, this is a quest for power because the stepmother controlled the step-sisters by making them chop off parts of their feet to fit the slipper. She made the step-sisters o this so one of them could marry the prince, which would benefit her by becoming Queen, hence giving her more power. The stepmother also had another quest of power in the story, which was successfully having control over Cinderella. She controlled her physically, making her work hard from morning till night (241), and until she was completely drained. The stepmother also had control over whether or not Cinderella could go to the festival. She only agreed to let Cinderella go if she did tasks for her that were very tedious and that could not be finished in a set amount of time. However, Cinderella proved her wrong and completed everything on time, but the stepmother still did not let her go regardless of the deal she made. This example supports my opinion that this is a quest for power because the stepmother had control over Cinderella actions. I believe that the stepmother was power-hungry and felt superior to Cinderella especially since she turned her back on her and even said to her that we would be ashamed of thee (242). She knew without a doubt that she had complete power over Cinderella too. In fact, she knew right then and there that when Cinderella begged ere to go, that no matter what, there was no way she would ever let Cinderella go to the festival. The stepmother made Cinderella do those tedious tasks not because she actually considered letting her go, but out of her own spite Just because she knew she had that much control over her, which is why it is an example of a quest of power. Unlike the step-sisters and stepmother, the Prince did not desire riches and power because he already had those; he was on a quest for romance. He was extremely persistent trying to find Cinderella because each night she kept escaping from him. Hat got one of Cinderella slippers stuck on the staircase. The next day when he set out to find the girl whose foot fit the slipper, he arrived where Cinderella resided. Both of the step-sisters were caught falsely impersonating Cinderella, which made him demand that the last remaining daughter, Cinderella, was to be sent down to try the slipper which of course fit perfectly. This is a quest for romance because the Prince stopped at nothing to find Cinderella. He strategists and went through extreme measures of searching to find his true love. He even said to his father that No one else shall be my wife but she whose foot this golden slipper fits (244). By him saying that, you can really tell how much he wanted to be with Cinderella, and that he would not settle for anyone else but her. So far I have described different quests for romance, riches, and power made by some of the characters in the story. But what about the main character herself? I actually found that Cinderella was not on a quest for any of those. I think ultimately, she really Just wanted to be accepted and to be included with her family. However, it is very ironic that even though she was not on a pursuit to gain romance, riches, or rower, she actually got all three in the end. In the beginning of the story, before the father went to the fair, he asked all of the daughters what they wanted him to bring back for them. Of course the step-sisters asked for materialistic items, but Cinderella only asked for the first branch that knocked her fathers hat off on the way home. It seems somewhat odd to ask for a tree branch out of all the things she could have gotten, but surprisingly it turned out to be more valuable than anything else. Because she planted the branch at her mothers grave and sat and cried next to it ACH day, it grew to be a great tree. By doing that, a white bird was always at the tree and every time Cinderella wished for something, the bird would throw down whatever she wished for. It was almost as if she acquired a fairy godmother, but I think it actually was her mother being her guardian angel. I believe that because when her mother was on her deathbed, she said to Cinderella: Dear child, be good and pious, and then the good God will always protect thee, and I will look down on thee from heaven and be near thee (241). By interpreting that quote, I think it is a nit saying that the little bird that was always near Cinderella was her mother being her guardian angel and taking care of her because Cinderella remained a very good person despite the fact that people were not good to her. So the seemingly worthless branch her father brought back for her actually turned out to be a huge blessing to Cinderella. If it was not for her asking for the branch, she would have never gotten her guardian angel that granted her wishes. If her wishes never got granted, she would have never acquired the beautiful dresses to wear to the festival and would have never gotten to meet the prince. It was all fate. I think the story was trying to teach a lesson here by saying that you should always be a good person and to live life the right way, because everything eventually falls into place and some of the best things in life come to you unexpectedly. In conclusion, by looking at the story in this sort of light, there is a lot more to the story than reading about a girl that lives happily ever after with her prince. It can be All of the characters were on a pursuit of romance, riches, or power, except one. But even though Cinderella did not directly go after those desires, she still got everything n the end. You see, some of the characters were very dark at heart, and because of that they did not have successful quests for what they wanted in life because they did not deserve to. The characters that were truly good people got what they wanted and even more, because they actually did deserve it. I think ultimately by looking at the story through this perspective, it changes its meaning by sending out a message that says: you should go about pursuing your dreams and desires in life the right way, because in the end you get what you truly deserve.

Discrimination And Empowerment In Mental Health Social Work Essay Essay Example

Discrimination And Empowerment In Mental Health Social Work Essay Essay Example Discrimination And Empowerment In Mental Health Social Work Essay Essay Discrimination And Empowerment In Mental Health Social Work Essay Essay This essay will foremost specify what favoritism is and what it means to know apart against something. It will so explicate what it means to know apart against person or a group in societal work pattern. This will be a really wide definition that encompasses a assortment of different service user groups. Examples will be used to show what favoritism may look like in societal work pattern and mundane life. To derive a better understand the essay will critically research theory and thoughts around power and how power manifests between groups. This portion of the essay will touch on the thought of othering . The essay will utilize societal constructionism theory to analyze this construct of power. The essay will so concentrate in on mental wellness. This portion of the essay will foremost look at what a mental wellness job is and research the stigma of being labelled with a mental wellness job. The essay will so travel deeper to concentrate on how the western medical theoretical account can know apart against Black and Ethnic Minority groups ( BME ) , even if indirectly. The essay will so critically research why BME grownups, peculiarly work forces, are overrepresented in the mental wellness service. Links will be made to institutional racism and the fact that BME kids are underrepresented in kid and adolescent mental wellness services ( CAMHS ) . In in broadest definition, to know apart agencies to distinguish or to recognize a differentiation ( Oxford Dictionaries 2012 ) . In this wide sense it is a portion of day-to-day life to know apart. For illustration, an grownup may know apart between lanes on a expressway and a babe will frequently know apart between a alien and their health professional. Discrimination becomes a job when the difference or recognised differentiation is used for the footing of unjust intervention. This is the favoritism that societal workers need to be argus-eyed for. Discrimination is non ever knowing ( Thompson 2009 ) and there are assorted types of favoritism ( EHRC 2012 ) . Discrimination can be direct, indirect, based on the perceptual experience that person has a protected feature or discriminate against person who is associated with a individual who has a protected feature ( EHRC 2012 ) . The Equality Act ( 2010 ) besides aims to protect people with a protective feature ( s ) from exploitation, torment and failure to do sensible accommodations ( Home Office 2012 ) . Thompson s ( 1997 ) PCS theoretical account demonstrates that favoritism is non ever on a personal degree and it is non merely entirely down to the person. I will return to the PCS theoretical account subsequently on in the essay. Social workers act as mediators between service users and the province. Social workers are in a function that can potentially authorise or suppress ( Thompson 1997 ) . For this ground Thompson ( 1997: 11 ) argues that good pattern must be anti-discriminatory pattern . All other countries of pattern could be superb and the societal worker could hold really good purposes but if the societal worker can non recognize the marginalised place of some of the people they are working with their intercessions could potentially farther oppress ( Thompson 1997 ) . Thompson ( 1997 ) reminds the reader many times throughout the book that If you re non portion of the solution you are portion of the job . I choose to include this because it reinforces that societal workers need to dispute favoritism and take action against it. To accept it and to non swim against the tide does so do us portion of the job. Where does discrimination come from and why do people, establishments and systems know apart against people? This portion of the essay will critically research the construct of power and societal constructionism in relation to favoritism and societal work. Power is defined by Haralambos and Holborn 2000: 540 ) really slackly as the ability to acquire your ain manner even when others are opposed to your wants . This is of class a really simple definition of a complex construct. There are many theoretical accounts and theories around power. Thompson ( 1998: 42 ) identified a common subject of the ability to act upon or command people, events, processes or resources . These common subjects of power all have the possible to be used destructively in societal work. Social workers have the ability and power to act upon and command, whether this is on an single personal degree or as a gate keeper of services or agent of control. Social workers need to be cognizant of power as they work w ith people who are marginalised and powerless in comparing ; people who societal workers could potentially suppress and even worse, maltreatment. Giddens ( 1993 ) makes close links between power and inequality. EHRC Equality and human rights commission. , 2012. [ Viewed 2012.11.10 ] What is favoritism? [ online ] . Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.equalityhumanrights.com/advice-and-guidance/education-providers-schools-guidance/key-concepts/what-is-discrimination/ Giddens, A. , 1993. Sociology ( 2nd erectile dysfunction ) . Cambridge: Civil order Haralambos, M, Holborn, M. , 2000. Sociology subjects and positions. London: HarperCollins Publishers Ltd Home Office. , 2012. [ viewed 2012.11.11 ] Equality Act 2010 [ on-line ] . Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.homeoffice.gov.uk/equalities/equality-act/ Oxford Dictionaries. , 2012. [ Viewed 2012.10.19 ] Discriminate [ Online ] . Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/discriminate? q=discriminate Thompson, N. , 1997. Anti-Discriminatory pattern ( 2nd erectile dysfunction ) . Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Thompson, N. , 1998. Promoting Equality disputing favoritism and subjugation in human services. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Ltd Thompson, N. , 2009. Rehearsing societal work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

Md5-8 Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Md5-8 - Coursework Example Also, it will be essential for them to monitor continually how the internet use development affects consumers and competition (Paley, 2005). Concentrating on the pricing strategies, Rolex watches employed a marketing strategy by using a premium pricing strategy. Rolex positioned its price distinctively from its competitors. The role of the pricing strategy adopted by Rolex watches was to portray its product as unique in terms of its quality and the reputable Swiss watches brand name. In contrast, Timex watches adopted a penetrating price strategy. Timex to penetrate the market resorted to having its watches priced slowly compared to its competitors like Rolex. It was meant to attract buyers and capture the share of the watch market. Both Timex and Rolex employed different pricing strategies. The difference is that Rolex highly priced its watches so as to have a distinct competitive advantage. On the other hand, Timex lowly priced its watches to raise awareness and penetrate the market. Basing on the Direct Marketing Strategies, there is a possibility that the internet or electronic direct marketing may replace old direct mail options and conventional catalogues promotions. The switch is because the internet as a direct electronic marketing tool is a more direct marketing tool compared to the conventional catalogues. The Internet enables consumers to be reached in an interactive manner. The rationale behind the switch to internet use as a direct marketing tool is because of its ability to communicate and carry out a promotion in a better way. Besides, the internet has proved to be less costly and enabled monitoring of the progress of the promotion and marketing (Paley, 2005). There is a justification to the reason there is a need to carry out a marketing audit of an in a unit of business even though its performance may be indeed